以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 36-42.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.10.036

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

患者参与患者安全知信行质性研究的系统评价

詹昱新1a, 杨中善1b, 莫梦燕2, 李素云1a, 喻姣花1a   

  1. 1.华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院 a.护理部;b.神经外科,湖北 武汉 430022;
    2.长治医学院附属和平医院 神经外科,山西 长治 046000
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-07 出版日期:2020-05-25 发布日期:2020-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 喻姣花（1966-）,女,湖北黄冈人,硕士,主任护师。
  • 作者简介:詹昱新（1982-）,女,湖北武汉人,本科学历,主管护师。

Qualitative Study on Knowledge-attitude-practice of Patients' Participation in Patients' Safety: A Systematic Review

ZHAN Yu-xin1a, YANG Zhong-shan1b, MO Meng-yan2, LI Su-yun1a, YU Jiao-hua1a   

  1. 1a. Dept. of Nursing Administration; 1b. Dept. of Neurosurgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China;
    2. Dept. of Neurosurgery,Heping Hospital Affiliated of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, China
  • Received:2020-01-07 Online:2020-05-25 Published:2020-07-15

PDF (PC)

279

赞

摘要： 目的 系统评价患者参与患者安全知信行的质性研究,为促进患者参与患者安全管理决策提供依据。方法 计算机检索PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库关于患者参与患者安全知信行的质性研究,检索时限从建库至2019年8月。采用2017版澳大利亚循证卫生保健中心质性研究评价标准（JBI-QARI）进行文献质量评价,采用汇集性整合方法对研究结果进行比较、分析、归纳、诠释和综合。结果 共纳入12项研究,提炼出42个研究结果,综合成为3个整合结果和归纳形成8个新的类别：患者的认知态度、实践的障碍因素和患者的需求期望。结论 医疗机构和医务人员应高度重视患者参与患者安全的组织管理和实践管理,从不同层面全方位地引导患者提高参与认知、增强参与信念及促进参与行动,从而保障患者安全和医疗安全。

关键词: 患者参与患者安全, 知信行, 质性研究, 系统评价

Abstract: Objective To conduct a systematic review of patients' knowledge-attitude-practice in participating in patient safety, and provide basis for promoting patients' participation in patients' safety management. Methods We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database for qualitative research on patients' knowledge-attitude-practice in participating in patients' safety. The retrieval time was from the inception of the database to August 2019. After evaluating the quality of literature using the Australian Evidence-based Health Care Center (JBI-QARI, 2017 edition) qualitative research quality evaluation criteria, meta-integration was carried out by using aggregative integration method, and the results were compared, analyzed, summarized, interpreted and synthesized. Results Twelve studies were included, and 42 results were extracted. Eight categories were summarized and integrated into three results including cognitive attitudes towards patients' participation, barriers to patients' participation, and expectations of patients' needs for participation. Conclusion Medical institutions and staffs should attach great importance to the organizational and practical management of patients' participation in patients' safety, and guide patients to improve their participation cognition, belief and action from different perspectives, so as to ensure patients' safety and medical safety.

Key words: patients' participation in patients' safety, knowledge-attitude-practice, qualitative research, systematic review

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] Florin J,Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M.Patients’ and Nurses’ Perceptions of Nursing Problems in An Acute Care Setting[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2005,51(2):140-149.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03477.x.
[2] Pronovost PJ, Bo-Linn GW.Preventing Patient Harms Through Systems of Care[J]. JAMA, 2012, 308(8):769-770. DOI:10.1001/jama.2012.9537.
[3] World Health Organization. WHO Calls for Urgent Action to Reduce Patient Harm in Healthcare[EB/OL].(2019-09-13)[2020-03-18].https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/13-09-2019-who-calls-for-urgent-action-to-reduce-patient-harm-in-healthcare.
[4] World Health Organisation. Patients for Patient Safety Partnerships for Safer Health Care.[EB/OL].(2013-02-28)[2020-03-18].https://www.who.int/patientsafety/patients_for_patient/PFPS_brochure_2013.pdf?ua=1.
[5] Berger Z, Flickinger TE, Pfoh E, et. Promoting Engagement by Patients and Families to Reduce Adverse Events in Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review[J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2014, 23(7):548-555. DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001769.
[6] 王雅星,徐蕊芳,关志,等. 痴呆患者参与决策及决策辅助的研究进展[J]. 护理学报,2019,26(13):38-43. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.13.038.
[7] 苑娜,刘春娥,于蕾,等. 外科手术患者参与手术决策的现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(4):47-50. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.04.047.
[8] Duhn L, Medves J.A 5-facet Framework to Describe Patient Engagement in Patient Safety[J]. Health Expect, 2018, 21(6):1122-1133. DOI:10.1111/hex.12815.
[9] 叶旭春,刘朝杰,刘晓虹. 患者对患者安全感知的质性研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2013, 19(25):3029-3032. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2013.25.002.
[10] Martin HM, Navne LE, ipczak H. Involvement of Patients with Cancer in Patient Safety: A Qualitative Study of Current Practices,Potentials and Barriers[J].BMJ Quality Safety,2013,22(10):836-842.DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001447.
[11] Rainey H, Ehrich K, Mackintosh N, et al.The role of Patients and Their Relatives in ‘Speaking Up’ about Their Own Safety-a Qualitative Study of Acute Illness[J]. Health Expectations, 2015, 18(3):392-405. DOI:10.1111/hex.12044.
[12] Bishop, Andrea C, Macdonald, et al. Patient Involvement in Patient Safety: A Qualitative Study of Nursing Staff and Patient Perceptions[J]. J Patient Saf, 2014(2):1-6. DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000123.
[13] 李宁,李艳鑫,杨柳. 心脏外科患者对参与患者安全管理认知的质性研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2015, 31(12): 874-877. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2015.12.005.
[14] 朱琴,颜巧元,张蓓蓓. 住院患者参与患者安全真实体验的质性研究[J]. 现代临床护理,2017,17(12):46-51. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2017.12.012.
[15] Burrows Walters C, Duthie E.Patients’ Perspectives of Engagement as a Safety Strategy[J]. Oncology Nursing Forum, 2017, 44(6):712-718. DOI:10.1188/17.ONF.712-718.
[16] Ringdal M, Chaboyer W, Ulin K, et al.Patient Preferences for Participation in Patient Care and Safety Activities in Hospitals[J]. BMC Nursing, 2017, 16(1):69-76.DOI:10.1186/s12912-017-0266-7.
[17] De Brún Aoife, Heavey E, Waring J, et al.PReSaFe: A Model of Barriers and Facilitators to Patients Providing Feedback on Experiences of Safety[J]. Health Expectations, 2017, 20:770-771. DOI:10.1111/hex.12516.
[18] 朱琴,颜巧元. 乳腺癌化疗患者参与患者安全感知的质性研究[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2018, 24(1):29-32.
[19] Schenk EC, Bryant RA, Van SCR, et al.Perspectives on Patient and Family Engagement With Reduction in Harm[J]. Journal of Nursing Care Quality,2018:1-7.DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000333.
[20] New L, Goodridge D, Kappel J, et al.“I Just Have to Take It”-patient safety in Acute Care: Perspectives and Experiences of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease[J]. BMC Health Services Research, 2019, 19:199-209.DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4014-4.
[21] The Joanna Briggs Institute. Criticl Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research[EB/OL].(2019-05-28)[2019-09-18].https://joannabriggs.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI_Crit-ical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Qualitative_Research2017_0.pdf.
[22] 王灿,蒋艳余. 临床护理用药管理及用药差错预防的研究进展[J].护理学报, 2017, 24(4):30-34.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.04.030.
[23] James JT.A New,Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care[J]. J Patient Saf, 2013, 9:122-128.DOI:10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69.
[24] 詹昱新,喻姣花,李凌志,等.医务人员对患者参与患者安全知信行质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(24):52-56. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.24.00.
[25] 朱琴,颜巧元. 患者参与患者安全标准化管理方案的研究现状及启示[J]. 中华护理杂志,2018, 53(7):127-130.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.07.027.
[26] 金环,喻姣花,李鑫,等. 护理不良事件人因可靠性数据库的设计与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3):13-16. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.03.008.
[1] 王艳, 朱桂玲. 肠造口术后患者基于行为改变理论的护理干预效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 54-58.
[2] 刘丽萍, 吴艳妮, 从维莲, 胡明钰, 李晓霞, 周春兰. 癌症患者化疗期自我护理体验质性研究的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 1-6.
[3] 尹霄朦, 胡波, 王薇, 姜园园, 莘秀芳, 朱秀丽. 基于角色理论医学硕士研究生对导师角色期望的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 1-5.
[4] 张新, 崔菡斐, 董凤齐, 郑瑞双. 护理学硕士学历护士临床工作体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(4): 25-31.
[5] 张丹妮, 朱慧, 谢传艺, 陈肖敏. 乳腺癌患者配偶照顾体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(4): 32-36.
[6] 田凡立, 李惠玲, 杜美兰, 蒋芳琴, 张新梅, 殷雪群. 新型冠状病毒肺炎下援鄂男护士情绪体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 46-49.
[7] 张爱琴, 陈俊杉, 余金甜. ICU患者谵妄非药物管理相关指南的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 26-32.
[8] 叶冬婷, 张沁莲, 景霜, 郭佳, 邢雁芬. 家属对ICU患者转出体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 33-39.
[9] 周莹, 卢洪洲, 张林, 孙美艳. 门诊艾滋病男患者对个案管理体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 1-4.
[10] 黄莺莺, 曹卫平, 韦嘉洁, 李妍. 妊娠期高血压疾病患者患病体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 5-9.
[11] 王鹏程, 孟爱凤, 智晓旭, 汤琳, 路莉静, 浦亚楼. 青少年癌症患者生活体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 43-48.
[12] 周璇, 周兰姝. 脑卒中偏瘫患者对社会参与概念理解的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(8): 5-8.
[13] 虞立, 姜金霞. ICU患者对早期活动认知和态度的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(8): 9-12.
[14] 王洁, 郭燕. 急性白血病患儿照顾者照护知信行问卷的编制及信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(6): 1-5.
[15] 吴斌, 武丽桂, 袁玲, 郭苗苗, 彭卫琴, 夏浩志. 肿瘤安宁疗护患者亲属照顾者照护体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(6): 6-9.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!