0~6周岁儿童父母二元应对在心理韧性对育儿压力影响中的主客体互倚中介效应分析

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.24.043

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的构建0~6周岁儿童父母二元应对在心理韧性对育儿压力影响中的主客体互倚中介模型,探讨父母自身及配偶心理韧性对自身育儿压力的影响,以及自身二元应对及配偶二元应对的中介作用。方法采用方便抽样的方法,选择安徽、浙江、江苏、上海等省份不同社区的604对0~6周岁儿童父母作为研究对象,采用一般资料问卷、心理韧性量表中文版、二元支持应对量表、简式养育压力量表进行调查。结果（1）本组0~6周岁儿童父亲的心理韧性和母亲的心理韧性得分、父亲的二元应对和母亲的二元应对得分、父亲的育儿压力和母亲的育儿压力得分比较,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）;（2）本组0~6周岁儿童父亲的育儿压力与父亲的心理韧性、父亲的二元应对、母亲的心理韧性、母亲的二元应对得分均呈负相关（r=-0.365、-0.299、-0.119、-0.146,均P<0.05）,母亲的育儿压力与母亲的心理韧性、母亲的二元应对、父亲的心理韧性和父亲的二元应对得分均呈负相关（r=-0.364、-0.347、-0.201、-0.209,均P<0.05）。（3）主体效应中本组0~6周岁儿童母亲的二元应对在自身心理韧性对育儿压力的影响中起到部分中介作用（效应值：-0.085,占总效应值的24.43%,P<0.05）,父亲的二元应对在自身心理韧性对育儿压力的影响中起到部分中介作用（效应值：-0.084,占总效应值的24.42%,P<0.05）;客体效应中母亲的二元应对在父亲心理韧性对母亲育儿压力的影响中起完全中介作用（效应值：-0.017,P<0.05）,父亲的二元应对在母亲的心理韧性对父亲的育儿压力的影响中起完全中介作用（效应值：-0.017,P<0.05）。结论提示在今后改善0~6周岁儿童父母育儿压力干预的临床研究中,不仅需要考虑自身心理韧性的作用,还要考虑自身二元应对分别在自身和配偶心理韧性对育儿压力影响中发挥的中介作用。

关键词: 育儿压力, 心理韧性, 二元应对, 主客体互倚中介模型

Abstract: Objective To construct an Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model of parental dyadic coping in the effect of psychological resilience on parenting stress among parents of children aged 0 to 6 years, and to explore the effects of father's and mother's psychological resilience on their own parenting stress, and the mediating roles of their own and spouses' dyadic coping. Methods A convenience sampling method was used to select 604 pairs of parents of children aged 0 to 6 years from different communities in Anhui, Zhejiang, Jiangsu Province, and Shanghai as the study subjects, and the general information questionnaire, the Chinese version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the Dyadie Coping Inventory, and the Chinese version of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form were used to conduct the survey. Results The differences between fathers' and mothers' psychological resilience score, fathers' and mothers' dyadic coping score, and fathers' and mothers' parenting stress score were statistically significant (P<0.05). Parenting stress in fathers was negatively correlated with fathers' psychological resilience and dyadic coping, and mothers' psychological resilience and dyadic coping (r= -0.365, -0.299, -0.119, -0.146, all P<0.05), and parenting stress in mothers was negatively correlated with mothers' psychological resilience and dyadic coping, and fathers' psychological resilience and dyadic coping (r= -0.364, -0.347, -0.201, -0.209, all P<0.05). In terms of subject effects, mothers' dyadic coping played a partial mediating role in the influence of their own psychological resilience on parenting stress (effect size: -0.085, accounting for 24.43% of the total effect size, P<0.05), and fathers' dyadic coping played a partial mediating role in the influence of their own psychological resilience on parenting stress (effect size: -0.084, accounting for 24.42% of the total effect size, P<0.05). Moreover, the dyadic coping of mothers fully mediated the effect of fathers' psychological resilience on mothers' parenting stress (effect size: -0.017, P<0.05), and fathers' dyadic coping fully mediated the effect of mothers' psychological resilience on fathers' parenting stress regarding object effect (effect size: -0.017, P<0.05). Conclusion This study suggests that it is necessary to consider not only the role of individual psychological resilience, but also the mediating role that individual's dyadic coping plays in the effects of individual's and his/her spouse's psychological resilience on individual parenting stress in future clinical research to improve parenting stress among parents of children aged 0 to 6 years, respectively.

Key words: parenting stress, psychological resilience, dyadic coping, Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model

中图分类号:

R473.72

钟起, 徐雨洁, 严伟玲. 0~6周岁儿童父母二元应对在心理韧性对育儿压力影响中的主客体互倚中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 43-48.

ZHONG Qi, XU Yu-jie, YAN Wei-ling. Actor-partner interdependence mediation analysis of parental dyadic coping in effect of psychological resilience on parenting stress among parents of children aged 0 to 6 years[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(24): 43-48.

参考文献

[1] Zhang H.The Influence of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on family violence in China[J]. J Fam Violence, 2022, 37(5):733-743. DOI:10.1007/s10896-020-00196-8.
[2] Dong S, Dong Q, Chen H.Mothers' parenting stress, depression, marital conflict, and marital satisfaction: the moderating effect of fathers' empathy tendency[J]. J Affect Disorders, 2022(299):682-690. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.079.
[3] 侯娟,潘学飞,马美静等.新生婴儿父母养育压力对婚姻质量的影响:配偶支持的中介作用[J].心理与行为研究,2019,17(1):97-106.
[4] 罗丽,余淑婷,高妙.我国婴幼儿照护现状研究[J].中国青年社会科学,2022, 41(6):86-94.DOI:10.16034/j.cnki.10-1318/c.2022.06.020.
[5] Zhang Y, Lin H, Jiang WB, et al.Third birth intention of the childbearing-age population in mainland China and sociodemographic differences: a cross-sectional survey[J]. BMC Public Health, 2021,21(1):2280. DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-12338-8.
[6] 陈双艺,仇剑崟.心理韧性的研究进展[J].上海交通大学学报:医学版, 2021,41(10):1397-1400.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.10.021.
[7] 甘颖. 家庭再生产与父母协作式育儿[J].中国青年研究,2022(7):64-71. DOI:10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2022.0092.
[8] Kuo PX, Johnson VJ.Whose parenting stress is more vulnerable to marital dissatisfaction? A within-couple approach examining gender, cognitive reappraisal, and parental identity[J]. Fam Process, 2021,60(4):1470-1487. DOI:10.1111/famp.12642.
[9] Alves S, Fonseca A, Canavarro M,et al.Does dyadic coping predict couples' postpartum psychosocial adjustment? A dyadic longitudinal study[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2020, 11:561.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561091.
[10] 邱佳玲,李锦粤,范潇茹,等.基于主客体互依中介模型分析成对数据中的中介效应[J].中国卫生统计, 2021,38(5):679-682.DOI:10.3969 /j.issn.1002-3674.2021.05.009.
[11] 陈圆,李嘉玲,欧璐,等.在读护理硕士研究生的职业结果预期在领悟社会支持和专业承诺的中介效应[J].护理学报,2023,30(16):7-11. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.16.007.
[12] 梁珊,于腾飞,刘文敬,等.父母产后抑郁与育儿胜任感:有调节的中介效应[J].中国临床心理学杂志, 2021,29(5):1040-1044. DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2021.05.030.
[13] Yu XN, Zhang J.Factor Analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese people[J].Social Behavior and Personality (an International Journal), 2007,35(1):19-30. DOI:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.19.
[14] Xu F, Hilpert P, Randall AK,et al.Validation of the dyadic coping inventory with Chinese couples: factorial structure, measurement invariance, and construct validity[J].Psychological Assessment, 2016, 28(8):e127.DOI:10.1037/pas0000329.
[15] 任文秀. 幼儿父母亲亲职压力、因应策略与亲子关系满意之间关系研究[D].台北:台湾师范大学,1995.
[16] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5):731-745.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00731.
[17] Zhang J, Yu NX, Zhou M, et al.Dyadic effects of resilience on well-being in Chinese older couples: Mediating role of spousal support[J]. J Fam Psychol, 2017, 31(3):273-281. DOI:10.1037/fam0000250.
[18] 王希茜,何宗樾.男性育儿参与、家庭传统文化观念与女性劳动供给[J].中央财经大学学报,2022(9):88-103. DOI:10.19681/j.cnki.jcufe.2022.09.005.
[19] Majdandži M, Vente W, Bögels MS.Challenging parenting behavior from infancy to toddlerhood: etiology, measurement, and differences between fathers and mothers[J]. Infancy, 2016, 21(4):423-452. DOI:10.1111/infa.12125.
[20] Michelle Y, Shelley R, Patricia K.Role of marital adjustment in associations between romantic attachment and coparenting[J]. Family Relations, 2017, 66(2):331-345. DOI:10.1111/fare.12245.
[21] Marie D, Annie B, Chantal C, et al.Marital satisfaction, parenting stress, and family alliance: parental perspective taking as a moderator[J]. Family process,2023,62(3):1147-1160.DOI:10.1111/famp.12812.
[22] 张孝栋,张雅璐,贾国平,等.中国低生育率研究进展:一个文献综述[J].人口与发展,2021,27(6):9-21. DOI:1674-1668(2021)06-0009-13.
[23] Hong XM, Zhu WT, Luo L.Non-parental care arrangements, parenting stress, and demand for infant-toddler care in China: evidence from a national survey[J]. Frontiers in psychology,2022,12:822104.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.822104.
[24] 吴怡霖,冯喜珍,刘燕,等.父母教养压力、心理韧性与婚姻质量:主客体互倚分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2023,31(2):471-475+480.DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2023.02.044.
[25] 杨婧,王詠,宋莉莉.心理韧性的神经机制研究进展[J].神经解剖学杂志, 2019,35(1):88-92.DOI:10.16557/j.cnki.1000-7547.2019.01.016.
[26] 陈伟,秦楠,李辉.癌症患者及其配偶二元应对的相关研究进展[J].护理学报,2022,29(11):31-35. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.11.031.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared