以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (22): 44-49.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.22.044

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

肢体功能障碍患者应用康复机器人体验质性研究的Meta整合

毕轩懿, 闫妍, 叶旭春   

  1. 海军军医大学 护理系,上海 200433
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-22 出版日期:2023-11-25 发布日期:2023-12-07
  • 通讯作者: 叶旭春（1972-）,女,浙江建德人,博士研究生,教授,教研室主任。E-mail: ye_xch8639@163.com
  • 作者简介:毕轩懿（1998-）,男,江苏宜兴人,硕士,助教。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目（71974196）

Qualitative research on user experience of rehabilitation robots for patients with limb dysfunction: a Meta-integration

BI Xuan-yi, YAN Yan, YE Xu-chun   

  1. Department of Nursing, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2023-06-22 Online:2023-11-25 Published:2023-12-07

PDF (PC)

78

赞

摘要： 目的 系统评价肢体功能障碍患者对康复机器人应用体验的质性研究。方法 检索PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、ProQuest、IEEE Xplore Digital Library、中国知网、维普、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库中的相关质性研究,检索时限为建库到2023年1月5日。依据澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心质性研究质量评价标准进行质量评价,运用汇集性整合法来整合结果。结果 共纳入16篇文献,提炼出55个研究结果,归纳整合成10个类别,综合得出3个整合结果：日渐显著的康复效果带来的身心益处、人-机器人交互中的多方障碍、着眼未来导向的用户期望。结论 肢体功能障碍患者使用康复机器人感知到来自生理、心理与社会的益处,但仍面临着个体、机器人、环境等因素的挑战,需重视从优化功能设计、加强技能培训、控制成本和落地社区等方面来提升康复机器人的用户体验,以促进机器人在国内康复护理领域的推广应用。

关键词: 肢体功能障碍, 康复机器人, 体验, Meta整合, 质性研究

Abstract: Objective To conduct a Meta-integration of user experience of rehabilitation robots for patients with limb dysfunction. Methods We researched databases of PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, ProQuest, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM for qualitative researches regarding patients' experience with rehabilitation robots from the inception to January 5, 2023, including. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for qualitative studies, and aggregative integration was used to analyze the results. Results A total of 16 studies were included, extracting 55 research results, and 3 synthesized findings including physical and mental benefits of increasingly pronounced effects, multiple barriers in human-robot interaction, and future-oriented user expectation were grouped from 10 categories. Conclusion Patients have perceived physical, psychological, and social benefits from using rehabilitation robots, but they still face individual, robotic, and environmental challenges. Optimized functional design, enhanced skills training, less expenditure, and application in communities will improve user experience of rehabilitation robots, so as to promote its application in domestic rehabilitation nursing.

Key words: limb dysfunction, rehabilitation robot, experience, Meta-synthesis, qualitative research

中图分类号: 

  • R49
[1] WHO. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities [EB/OL]. (2022-12-02) [2023-02-01]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063600.
[2] Straudi S, Severini G, Da Roit M, et al.The dose of robot-assisted gait therapy may influence functional recovery in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program: an exploratory retrospective study[J]. Int J Rehabil Res, 2020, 43(2):175-182. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000407.
[3] 苏予洁,裴菊红,钟娟平,等.康复机器人在脑性瘫痪儿童肢体康复中的应用进展[J].护理学报, 2022,29(17):23-27.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.17.023.
[4] Tamburella F, Lorusso M, Tramontano M, et al.Overground robotic training effects on walking and secondary health conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury: systematic review[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2022, 19(1):27. DOI:10.1186/s12984-022-01003-9.
[5] 毕轩懿,王轲,王婧婷.人工智能在健康领域应用现状与前景展望[J].医学信息学杂志,2020,41(1):7-13.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6036.2020.01.002.
[6] Lam MY, Tatla SK, Lohse KR, et al.Perceptions of technology and its use for therapeutic application for individuals with hemiparesis: findings from adult and pediatric focus groups[J]. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol,2015,2(1):e1. DOI: 10.2196/rehab.3484.
[7] Laparidou D, Curtis F, Akanuwe J, et al.Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative Meta-synthesis[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil,2021,18(1):181.DOI:10.1186/s12984-021-00976-3.
[8] 胡雁,郝玉芳.循证护理学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[9] Phelan SK, Gibson BE, Wright FV.What is it like to walk with the help of a robot? Children's perspectives on robotic gait training technology[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2015, 37(24): 2272-2281. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019648.
[10] Cherry CO, Chumbler NR, Richards K, et al.Expanding stroke telerehabilitation services to rural veterans: a qualitative study on patient experiences using the robotic stroke therapy delivery and monitoring system program[J]. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 2017, 12(1): 21-27. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1061613.
[11] Cahill A, Mc Ginley O, Bertrand C, et al.Gym-based exoskeleton walking: a preliminary exploration of non-ambulatory end-user perspectives[J]. Disabil Health J, 2018, 11(3): 478-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.01.004.
[12] Elnady A, Mortenson WB, Menon C.Perceptions of existing wearable robotic devices for upper extremity and suggestions for their development: findings from therapists and people with stroke[J]. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol, 2018, 5(1): e12. DOI: 10.2196/rehab.9535.
[13] Manns PJ, Hurd C, Yang JF.Perspectives of people with spinal cord injury learning to walk using a powered exoskeleton [J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2019, 16(1): 94. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0565-1.
[14] Thomassen G-KK, Jorgensen V, Normann B."Back at the same level as everyone else"-user perspectives on walking with an exoskeleton, a qualitative study[J]. Spinal Cord Ser Cases, 2019, 5: 103. DOI: 10.1038/s41394-019-0243-3.
[15] Heinemann AW, Kinnett-Hopkins D, Mummidisetty CK, et al.Appraisals of robotic locomotor exoskeletons for gait: focus group insights from potential users with spinal cord injuries[J]. Disabil Rehabil-Assist Technol, 2020, 15(7): 762-772. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1745910.
[16] Kinnett-Hopkins D, Mummidisetty CK, Ehrlich-Jones L, et al.Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 124. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9.
[17] Palmcrantz S, Plantin J, Borg J. Factors affecting the usability of an assistive soft robotic glove after stroke or multiple sclerosis[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2020, 52(3): jrm00027. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2650.
[18] Vaughan-Graham J, Brooks D, Rose L, et al.Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 123. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00750-x.
[19] Charbonneau R, Loyola-Sanchez A, Mcintosh K, et al.Exoskeleton use in acute rehabilitation post spinal cord injury: a qualitative study exploring patients' experiences[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2022, 45(6): 848-856. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1983314.
[20] Louie DR, Mortenson WB, Lui M, et al.Patients' and therapists' experience and perception of exoskeleton-based physiotherapy during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2022, 44(24): 7390-7398. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1989503.
[21] Chang YY, Chang SC, Xiao X, et al.The experiences of robot-assisted gait training in patients with neurological disorders: a qualitative study[J]. Rehabil Nurs, 2022, 47(4): 129-137. DOI: 10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000371.
[22] Van Dijsseldonk RB, Vriezekolk JE, Keijsers NLW, et al.Needs and wishes for the future lower limb exoskeleton: an interview study among people with spinal cord injury with community-based exoskeleton experience[J]. Disabil Rehabil,2023, 45(7):1139-1146. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2022.2055158. Epub ahead of print.
[23] Nedergård H, Sandlund M, Häger CK, et al.Users' experiences of intensive robotic-assisted gait training post-stroke - "a push forward or feeling pushed around?"[J/OL]. Disabil Rehabil,2023, 45(23):3861-3868.DOI:10.1080/09638288.2022.2140848.
[24] McDonald C, Fingleton C, Murphy S, et al. Stroke survivor perceptions of using an exoskeleton during acute gait rehabilitation[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1):14185. DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-18188-7.
[25] 兰继军,刘彤彤.残疾人的残疾态度、心理健康与主观幸福感的关系研究[J].残疾人研究, 2018(2):86-91.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0810.2018.02.012.
[26] Li L, Fu Q, Tyson S, et al.A scoping review of design requirements for a home-based upper limb rehabilitation robot for stroke[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2022, 29(6):449-463. DOI:10.1080/10749357.2021.1943797.
[27] 徐月花,任小萍,吴希杭,等.运动想象联合上肢训练器对脑卒中患者上肢功能康复效果的影响[J].护理学报,2022,29(12):63-66.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.12.063.
[28] Fiorini L, De Mul M, Fabbricotti I, et al.Assistive robots to improve the independent living of older persons: results from a needs study[J].Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 2021, 16(1):92-102. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2019.1642392.
[1] 吕璐洋, 王华芬, 卢芳燕, 王燕, 蒋树英. 肝移植患儿家庭照顾者出院准备体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(9): 13-17.
[2] 周祎敏, 姚宇哲, 叶旭春. 社区老年人对照护机器人感知与期望的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(9): 43-48.
[3] 王迪, 李现文. 基于SEIPS模型的认知症激越行为照护体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 23-28.
[4] 周瑜, 王励飞, 米元元, 王加谋. 精神科护士遭受医院II型暴力真实体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 58-62.
[5] 高芸芸, 刘芳, 刘维维. 公共卫生护士胜任力特征的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 23-28.
[6] 钱湛, 杨晓婷, 林觐民. 癌症患者生育忧虑体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 55-60.
[7] 谭健烽, 王永存, 郑秀莹, 王政烨, 刘艳华. 乳腺癌青年患者康复心理体验与益处发现的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 73-78.
[8] 韩燕, 徐彬, 蒋慧珠, 吴丽丽, 仓艳红. 校园欺凌致情绪障碍的青少年患者应对措施的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 74-78.
[9] 梁小燕, 蒋维连, 李春健, 欧艳芳, 刘佳萍. 临床护士实施课程思政教学促进及障碍因素的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 27-30.
[10] 董岩, 朱思颖, 王虹, 范甜甜, 黎玉梅, 韩媛. 青少年癌症幸存者重返校园体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 56-61.
[11] 温慧, 刘娟, 马帅, 李玉培, 郭迎坤, 李灵, 乔建红. 护士照护痴呆患者真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 45-50.
[12] 施敏敏, 潘盈盈, 张伟. 中医院校男护生临床实习角色扮演过程性真实体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(16): 24-27.
[13] 张玉敏, 刘于, 汪秧秧, 张惠荣, 周敏. 全喉切除术患者生活体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 52-57.
[14] 郭楠, 刘尖尖, 岳鹏. 痴呆患者与亲属照顾者情感互动过程的扎根研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(12): 7-12.
[15] 王雯, 曾钢, 叶君荣, 肖爱祥. 新入职精神科护士遭受患者言语暴力心理体验质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(12): 13-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 谢红燕,杨淑玲. 新型固定沙袋的制作[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 31 .
[2] 马婕,魏建华,白茹,雍琪. 1例重度卢德维氏咽峡炎患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 51 -52 .
[3] 胡亚妮,林平,钟远,张金丽. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者自我管理知识水平调查研究[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 12 -15 .
[4] 程维. 国外脑卒中患者护理质性研究的应用与启示[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 16 -19 .
[5] 杨秀梅,臧小彪,尹安春. 冰敷联合依沙吖啶冷湿敷治疗盐酸胺碘酮注射液所致静脉炎效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 66 -67 .
[6] 杨佼佼. 脑卒中偏瘫患者运动功能康复护理研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 15 -17 .
[7] 陈丽羚,赵惠芬,蔡珊红,庄丽玲,陈丽娜,蔡丽吟,李春燕. 泉州市12所医院ICU护士工作倦怠现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 21 -23 .
[8] 陈兰. 护理伦理困境的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 32 -35 .
[9] 金玉梅,章晓军,张华芬,王笑. 床边考核模式在新护士综合能力考评中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 41 -43 .
[10] 姚小春,李秀丽,赵丽平,雷小华. 双氯芬酸二乙胺凝胶预防化疗性静脉炎的临床观察[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 58 -59 .