以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (23): 21-24.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.23.021

• 护理管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

颅脑疾病鼻饲患者营养状况管理APP的建立与应用

胡芬, 袁敏   

  1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院 手外科,湖北 武汉 410000
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-23 发布日期:2020-07-27
  • 作者简介:胡 芬（1983-）,女,湖北武汉人,本科学历,主管护师。

Development of Nasogastric Nutrition Management APP for Patients with Cerebral Diseases and Its Application

HU Fen, YUAN Min   

  1. Dept. of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 410000, China
  • Received:2019-08-23 Published:2020-07-27

PDF (PC)

149

赞

摘要： 目的 建立颅脑疾病鼻饲患者营养状况管理APP并评价其应用效果。方法 将2018年1—6月收治的颅脑疾病鼻饲患者的90名主要照护者及其30名护理人员为对照组,采用常规护理及健康教育;2018年7—12月收治的颅脑疾病鼻饲患者的90名主要照护者及其30名护理人员为观察组,应用颅脑疾病鼻饲患者营养状况管理APP。结果 观察组营养风险筛查率明显高于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组患者营养状况明显优于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组患者的主要照护者及护理人员营养管理相关知识掌握程度明显高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 颅脑疾病鼻饲患者营养状况管理APP使护理评估更科学,提高了营养风险筛查率,增加了学习自主性,规范了护理流程,提高了护理质量,是颅脑疾病鼻饲患者营养状况的有效管理工具。

关键词: 颅脑疾病, 鼻胃管, 肠内营养, 护理信息学

Abstract: Objective To develop a nasogastric nutrition management APP for patients with cerebral diseases and evaluate its effects. Methods Ninety patients' primary caregivers admitted from January to June in 2018 and their 30 nursing staffs were involved as the control group and routine nursing care and health education were provided, while another 90 patients' primary caregivers and their 30 nursing staffs were included in the experimental group from July to December in 2018, and nasogastric nutrition management APP was promoted among them. Results The screening rate of nutritional risk in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05) and nutritional status of the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.05). Nutrition management knowledge of primary caregivers and nursing staffs in the experimental group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion With nasogastric nutrition management APP, nursing assessment becomes more scientific; the rate of nutrition risk screening increases; the nursing process is standardiezd, and quality of nursing is improved. It is an effective management tool for nasogastric nutrition management of patients with cerebral diseases.

Key words: cerebral diseases, nasogastric tube, enteral nutrition, nursing informatics

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] 蒋朱明,吴蔚然.肠内营养[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:385-394.
[2] 杜红娣,张立,何志娟,等. 98例痴呆患者营养状况与家庭照护能力相关性研究[J]. 护理学报,2018,25(15):48-52. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.15.048.
[3] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会.中国护理事业发展规划(2016-2020年)[EB/OL].(2016-11-18)[2019-09-06].http://www.nhffpc.gov.cn/yzygj/s3593/201611/92b2e8f8cc644a899e9d0fd572aefef3.
[4] Kondrup J, Rasmussen H H, Hamberg O, et al.Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS2002):A New Method Based on an Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials[J].Clin Nutr,2003,22(3):321-336.DOI:org/10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00214-5.
[5] American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition(A.S.P.E.N.)[EB/OL].[2019-02-11].https://www.guideline.gov/summaries/summary/50143/guidelines-for-the-provision-and-assessment-of-nutrition-support-therapy-in-the-adult-critically-ill-patient-society-of-critical-care-medicine-sccm-and-american-society-for-parenteral-and-enteral-nutrition-aspen?q=+provision+and+assessment+of+nutrition+support+therapy.
[6] 张颐,蒋朱明.营养筛查、评定与干预是成人营养诊疗的关键步骤:美国肠外肠内营养学会(ASPEN)2011年临床指南[J].中国临床营养杂志,2012, 20(5):261-268.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635X.2012.05.001.
[7] 俞红丽,冯蔚.微信支持在脑卒中家庭照护者健康教育中的应用[J].上海护理,2016,16(4):54-56.
[8] 王艳菊,李继云,胡一冰,等.网络信息化健康教育对手足口病患儿家长知识掌握情况的评价[J]. 护理实践与研究,2014,11(8):78-79. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2014.08.046.
[9] Mosselman M J, Kruitwagen C L, Schuurmans M J, et al.Malnutrition and Risk of Malnutrition in Patients with Stroke: Prevalence during Hospital Stay[J]. J Neurosci Nurs,2013, 45(4):194-204. DOI:org/10.1097/jnn.0b013e31829863cb.
[1] 陈亭, 孙红玉, 朱京慈. 重症急性胰腺炎患者肠内营养喂养不耐受防治策略研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(1): 23-27.
[2] 卜凡莉, 梁枫, 王珂, 黄骞, 彭南海. 对ICU行肠内营养支持患者胃残留量监测相关系统评价的再评价[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(5): 25-29.
[3] 吴觅之, 潘红英, 王珍. 标准化术语在护理决策支持系统知识库中的应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(17): 27-30.
[4] 臧丽丽, 时敏秀, 张旋, 唐亚男. 果胶加间断输注肠内营养剂在脑卒中伴吞咽障碍患者的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(14): 55-58.
[5] 胡恩华, 庞志强, 尹炜, 聂涛, 黄海燕. 1例重症肺炎产妇行体外膜肺氧合联合俯卧位通气治疗的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(11): 68-70.
[6] 詹昱新, 杨中善, 李素云, 喻姣花, 米元元, 黄海燕, 史雯嘉, 陈剑苹. 基于循证构建住院患者肠内营养护理质量评价指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(10): 26-31.
[7] 周瑜,米元元. ICU患者误吸研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(9): 39-43.
[8] 赵诗雨, 柯卉, 李梦圆, 熊璨, 喻姣花. 肠内营养补充剂防治压疮效果的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 24-30.
[9] 彭洁婧,黄璜. 改良流质鼻饲装置的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(10): 78-.
[10] 李梦圆,喻姣花. 肠内营养防治呼吸机相关性肺炎的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 35-38.
[11] 卞凌云,徐丽,马金,张红娇. 56例慢性肾脏病营养不良患者个体化营养干预[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(7): 55-57.
[12] 米元元,沈月,黄海燕,喻姣花,罗健. ICU患者肠内营养并发腹泻证据汇总[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(21): 58-66.
[13] 陈亚明,曹梅娟. 一种新型鼻胃管固定装置的设计[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(20): 76-77.
[14] 周田田,王保荣,朱小芳,乔瑶,王宜庭,邹圣强. ICU脓毒症患者肠内营养喂养不耐受的相关因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(16): 6-9.
[15] 金惠明,许月萍,陆金英. 神阙穴艾灸联合中药贴敷预防中风患者肠内营养相关性腹泻的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(4): 64-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 徐慧娜, 桂意华. ICU护士血液净化技术培训应用PBL教学法结合能力进阶模式的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 1 -5 .
[2] 汤琳, 孟爱凤, 智晓旭, 邾萍, 浦亚楼, 路莉静. 癌症青年患者社会心理干预的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 10 -13 .
[3] 严晓晶, 陈璐, 陈雁. 社区专科护士培训现状及研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 14 -17 .
[4] 卢舒颖, 刘宁, 魏璐华, 梁冬梅, 李妍. 产后出血预防及管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 18 -22 .
[5] 刘小成, 应文娟, 刘智利, 郑锐华, 许诺, 刘慧. 生命末期患者性与亲密关系评估的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 23 -27 .
[6] 林慧菁, 倪平. 932名武汉市民对生命维持治疗的态度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 28 -32 .
[7] 朱一凡, 陈芷谦, 郭巧红, 苏娅丽. 196例乳腺癌化疗患者尊严现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 33 -37 .
[8] 潘国翠, 李梅. 决策疲劳量表的汉化及其应用于ICU患者家属的信度效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 38 -41 .
[9] 贺芳, 温秀兰, 林艳, 刘会, 郭晓萍, 张喆. 新生儿重症监护病房噪音水平调查与对策[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 42 -45 .
[10] 田凡立, 李惠玲, 杜美兰, 蒋芳琴, 张新梅, 殷雪群. 新型冠状病毒肺炎下援鄂男护士情绪体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 46 -49 .