以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 28-34.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.05.028

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

210名肿瘤科护士专业生活品质现状及影响因素分析

刘明慧, 覃惠英   

  1. 中山大学肿瘤防治中心 综合科,广东 广州 510060
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-27 发布日期:2020-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 覃惠英（1966-）,女,广东清远人,硕士,主任护师,护理部主任,硕士研究生导师。
  • 作者简介:刘明慧（1985-）,女,广东广州人,硕士,主管护师。

Curent Status of Professional Quality of Life among Oncology Nurses and Its Influence Factors: A 210-case Study

LIU Ming-hui, QIN Hui-ying   

  1. VIP Region, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Received:2019-11-27 Published:2020-07-14

PDF (PC)

432

赞

摘要： 目的 调查肿瘤科护士专业生活品质的现状,分析其影响因素。方法 采用便利取样的方法,使用一般情况调查表、中文版护士专业生活品质量表、护士版健康促进生活方式量表对广州市3家肿瘤专科医院工作的210名护士进行问卷调查。采用多元线性回归分析肿瘤科护士专业生活品质的影响因素。结果 肿瘤科护士专业生活品质中共情满足、倦怠和二次创伤应激的原始分分别为（31.69±5.71）分、（26.87±4.32）分和（25.45±4.18）分,处于中高度共情满足水平、中高度倦怠水平和中高度二次创伤应激水平的肿瘤科护士分别占80.0%、77.7%和83.8%;肿瘤科护士健康促进生活方式总分为（60.00±14.21）分,处于中等水平。多元线性回归结果显示：自我实现、是否愿意护理临终患者、护士层级/职务进入共情满足维度的回归方程（P<0.05）,共解释总变异的42.0%;自我实现、人际支持发展、是否愿意护理临终患者、所在医院是否有举办关于护士心理支持活动或讲座进入倦怠维度的回归方程（P<0.05）,共解释总变异的37.8%;自我实现进入二次创伤应激维度的回归方程（P<0.05）,解释总变异的1.6%。结论 本组肿瘤科护士共情满足水平较高,共情疲劳水平也较高,总体专业生活品质有待提高;自我实现、是否愿意照顾临终患者、护士层级/职务是肿瘤科护士共情满足的影响因素,自我实现、人际支持发展、是否愿意护理临终患者、所在医院是否有举办关于护士心理支持活动或讲座是肿瘤科护士倦怠的影响因素,自我实现是肿瘤科护士二次创伤应激的影响因素。建议护理管理者关注肿瘤科护士的专业生活品质,及时识别改善可控的因素,采取相应的干预策略,例如改革薪酬、晋升、进修等制度,建立积极、健康、支持性的工作环境以及定期开展相关培训,提高护士的职业价值观,促进护士自我实现和人际支持发展,进而保持良好的专业生活品质。

关键词: 肿瘤科, 护士, 专业生活品质, 健康促进生活方式

Abstract: Objectives To describe the status of professional quality of life among oncology nurses, and to explore the influence factors. Methods By convenient sampling, a self-designed general questionnaire, the Chinese version of Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) and the Nurses' version of Health-promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) were used to investigate 210 oncology nurses from 3 cancer-specialist hospitals in Guangzhou. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to analyze the influence factors. Results The raw scores of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary trauma stress were 31.69±5.71, 26.87±4.32 and 25.45±4.18 respectively. Oncology nurses with a moderate to high level of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary trauma stress accounted for 80.0%, 77.7% and 83.8% of the total, respectively. The total score of health-promoting lifestyle among oncology nurses was 60.00±14.21, indicating a moderate level of health-promoting lifestyle. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that self-realization, willingness to care for hospice patients, position/professional title entered into the multiple regression equation of compassion satisfaction（P<0.05）, explaining 42.0% of the total variance. Self-realization, development of interpersonal support, willingness to care for hospice patients, and whether the hospital had organized activities or lectures on psychological support for oncology nurses, entered into the multiple regression equation of burnout (P<0.05), explaining 37.8% of the total variance. Self-realization entered into the multiple regression equation of secondary traumatic（P<0.05）, explaining 1.6% of the total variance. Conclusion The level of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue among oncology nurses is relatively high. The professional quality of life among oncology nurses needs to be improved. Oncology nurses' self-realization, development of interpersonal support, willingness to care for the hospice patients, position/professional title and whether the hospital had organized activities or lectures on psychological support are the main influence factors. Nursing managers should pay attention to oncology nurses' professional quality of life, identify the factors that can be controlled in time, and take individualized intervention measures to keep their professional quality of life.

Key words: oncology, nurse, professional quality of life, health-promoting lifestyle

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] Joinson C.Coping with Compassion Fatigue[J]. Nursing, 1992, 22(4):118-121.
[2] Figley CR.Compassion Fatigue as Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder: An Overview[M]. New York: Brunner-Routledge, 1995:1-20.
[3] Stamm BH.Measuring Compassion Satisfaction as well as Fatigue: Developmental History of the Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Test[M]. New York: Brunner-Routledge, 2002.
[4] Stamm BH.The ProQOL Manual: The Professional Quality of Life Scale: Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout & Compassion Fatigue/Secondary Trauma Scales[M]. Baltimore: Sidran Press, 2005:4-17.
[5] Yoder EA.Compassion Fatigue in Nurses[J]. Appl Nurs Res, 2010, 23(4):191-197. DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2008.09.003.
[6] Kim K, Han Y, Kim JS.Korean Nurses' Ethical Dilemmas, Professional Values and Professional Quality of Life[J]. Nurs Ethics,2015,22(4):467-478.DOI:10.1177/0969733014538892.
[7] Yu H, Jiang A, Shen J.Prevalence and Predictors of Compassion Fatigue, Burnout and Compassion Satisfaction among Oncology Nurses: A Cross-sectional Survey[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2016(57):28-38. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.012.
[8] Jang I, Kim Y, Kim K.Professionalism and Professional Quality of Life for Oncology Nurses[J]. J Clin Nurs,2016,25(19/20):2835-2845.DOI:10.1111/jocn.13330.
[9] Neville K, Cole DA.The Relationships Among Health Promotion Behaviors, Compassion Fatigue, Burnout, and Compassion Satisfaction in Nurses Practicing in a Community Medical Center[J]. JONA,2013,43(6):348-354.DOI:10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182942c23.
[10] Pender NJ, Murdaughc L, Parsons MA.Health Promotion in Nursing Practice[M].5th ed.New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006:37.
[11] Stamm BH. ProQOL Test[EB/OL].(2012-03-21)[2019-09-20]. http://www.proqol.org/ProQol_Test.html.
[12] Hooper C, Craig J, Janvrin DR, et al.Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Compassion Fatigue among Emergency Nurses Compared with Nurses in Other Selected in Patient Specialties[J]. J Emerg Nurs, 2010, 36(5):420-427.DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2009.11.027.
[13] 谢莹莹,曹姗姗,王艾红,等. 肿瘤内科护士共情疲劳与人格特征的相关性研究[J]. 护理学报,2018,25(21):1-4. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.21.001.
[14] 郑杏,杨敏,高伟,等. 中文版护士专业生活品质量表的信度效度检测[J]. 护理学杂志,2013,28(5):13-15.DOI:10.3870/hlxzz.2013.05.013.
[15] Walker SN, Sechrist K, Pender NJ.The Health-promoting Lifestyle Profile Ⅱ[R].Omaha:University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing, 1995.
[16] 黄毓华,丘启润.健康促进生活型态量表信效度之评估[J]. 高雄医学科学杂志, 1996,12(2):529-537.
[17] 宋素真,黄瑞美,林丽英. 临床护士与实习护生健康促进生活型态及相关因素之探讨[J].荣总护理, 2001,18(2):147-158.
[18] 洪静芳,李峥. 临床实习护生健康促进生活方式及相关因素的研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2008,42(2):103-107.
[19] 高娟. 护士专业生活品质、心理资本与工作投入的关系[D]. 济南:山东大学,2016.
[20] 潘金金,魏丽丽,孙黎惠,等. ICU护士专业生活品质与组织支持感的相关性研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018,18(9):1208-1212.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.09.012.
[21] Kelly L, Runge J, Spencer C.Predictors of Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction in Acute Care Nurses[J]. J Nurs Scholarsh, 2015, 47(6):522-528. DOI:10.1111/jnu.12162.
[22] 徐莹,唐昌敏.我国护理人员发展规模与配置现状研究[J].管理观察,2017(23):152-154.
[23] 沈洁,陆箴琦,姜安丽. 肿瘤护理人员职业情感体验的质性研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2013,30(1):5-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2013.01.002.
[24] 刘巧梅,王媛媛,谭开宇,等. 肿瘤科护士共情疲劳现状及其影响因素研究[J].中国护理管理,2016,16(5):614-620. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2016.05.011.
[25] 田梅梅,范霖,施雁,等. 临床护士共情疲劳的现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志,2018,53(1):76-82. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.01.014.
[26] 胡家祥. 马斯洛需要层次论的多维解读[J]. 哲学研究,2015(8):104-108.
[27] 王庆玲,余丽君. 北京市11家医院合同制护士生存现状调查[J]. 护理学报,2009,16(2A):24-26. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2009.03.018.
[28] 徐娜,张永爱,张晓娜,等. 1640名陕西省综合医院护士职业满意度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019,26(16):46-51. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.16.046.
[29] 赵允兰,胡晓莹. 护士同情心疲乏的现状及相关因素调查[J]. 医学与哲学,2013,34(2B):75-78.
[30] Yom YH, Kim HJ.Effects of Compassion Satisfaction and Social Support in the Relationship Between Compassion Fatigue and Burnout in Hospital Nurses[J]. J Korean Acad Nurs,2012, 42(6):870-878. DOI:10.4040/jkan.2012.42.6.870.
[31] 刘雯,康晓菲,方跃艳,等. 116名生殖科护士职业倦怠现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报, 2018, 25(3):46-49. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.03.046.
[32] 肖柳红,黄敏清,宋文强. 心灵工作室在肿瘤科护士面对患者死亡所致负性情绪中的应用[J].中国护理管理,2013,13(6):105-119.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2013.06.036.
[1] 殷倩, 董彩梅, 唐醒醒, 王月华, 庞丹莉. 基于认知负荷理论的阶梯式培训应用于新护士的效果评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 20-24.
[2] 庞丹莉, 董彩梅, 郑庆超, 赵琼玲, 殷倩. 791名育龄期护士职业发展现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 44-47.
[3] 王随琴, 关云, 李小妹. 社区护士主导多学科管理模式对糖尿病患者自我管理水平的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(6): 9-11.
[4] 谭蓉, 胡德英, 刘义兰, 罗凯燕. 医院患者自杀事件中731名第二受害者体验和支持需求水平分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(6): 29-34.
[5] 包延乔, 张文俐, 边晓璐, 刘芳媺. 叙事护理在新型冠状病毒肺炎病区护士中的干预研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(6): 44-48.
[6] 乐琼, 张岚, 吴丽芬, 刘恋, 罗黎, 许路萍. 新型冠状病毒肺炎抗疫护士应急培训及效果[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(6): 48-51.
[7] 赵晓宇, 李敬娥, 冯晶. 新型冠状病毒肺炎病区护士个人防护问题与对策[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(6): 52-54.
[8] 王英丽, 王惠珍, 张圣洁, 张海洋, 崔秋菊, 徐梅. 手术室兼职科研护士岗位的设置[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 6-8.
[9] 丁寒琴, 侯彩兰, 何夏君, 黄秋玲, 王越亚. 综合医院精神科开放式病房新护士岗位胜任力考核评价指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 9-13.
[10] 杜娟, 许翠萍, 何从军, 章笑天, 翟静. 5所三级甲等医院216名儿科护士核心能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 35-38.
[11] 李曼, 薛秀娟. 山东省50家二级及以上医院1 014名ICU护士对危重患者肠内喂养障碍的现状分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 39-41.
[12] 李迎春, 段燕, 杨利, 唐淑蓉, 廖磊, 龙晓秋, 何岳, 刘茜冉, 朱平. 258名抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎临床护士心理一致感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 47-51.
[13] 梁瑞晨, 郑思琳, 曾梁楠, 李倩茜, 明霞, 杨昌美. 基于智能云平台居家培训新型冠状病毒肺炎知识在储备护士中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 52-54.
[14] 黄琼珊, 陈曼华, 蔡莹莹, 杨素敏, 李怡君, 林淳. 可视化“护士指南针”交接班制度在神经外科的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(4): 11-15.
[15] 方金林, 叶红芳, 沈孟菲, 赵晓婷. 护士对员工援助计划的应用需求现状[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(4): 21-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 赵迪, 赵梦璐, 王娜, 付明晶, 梁凤, 张伟, 王爱敏. 青岛市592名社区老年人社会隔离现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 6 -10 .
[2] 高莹, 吴玉娥, 张建荣, 崔鑫浩, 陈淑玲, 叶丽芳, 杜秀珍. 基于循证构建轻症急性胰腺炎患者早期经口进食时机评估及管理方案[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 11 -15 .
[3] 谢延真, 李壮苗, 张佳宇, 纪秋露, 吴宇欣. 灸法治疗脑卒中后偏瘫的文献计量学分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 16 -20 .
[4] 练巧兰, 欧阳红莲. 成人ICU患者探视管理研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 21 -25 .
[5] 叶冬婷, 张沁莲, 景霜, 郭佳, 邢雁芬. 家属对ICU患者转出体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 33 -39 .
[6] 郭晓宇, 史冬立, 张振美, 李娜, 张佩凤, 杨丽娟. 全麻腰椎术后男性患者早期拔除尿管的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 46 -51 .
[7] 吴静, 姚惠萍, 何巧, 蒋美娜, 郎毅平, 刘仁洋. 成人重症患者血糖管理相关临床实践指南的质量评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 52 -56 .
[8] 李秋萍, 韩斌如, 陈曦. 外科大手术老年患者发生术后低蛋白血症影响因素的队列研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 66 -70 .
[9] 李细珍, 曹美嫦, 邓菊英, 曾满萍, 欧利芳. 叙事疗法对鼻咽癌患者癌症复发恐惧与希望水平的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 71 -74 .
[10] 徐丽芬, 杨荆艳, 颜巧元, 曾俊, 张燕. 永久性尿路造口患者应用视频版思维导图健康教育的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 75 -78 .