以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (16): 12-16.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.16.012

• 护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于知识图谱的高仿真模拟教学在“急危重症护理学”中的应用

荣欣雯, 史蕾, 秦芳, 方雅璇, 董广元, 李楠雁, 朱文婷   

  1. 南方医科大学 护理学院,广东 广州510515
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-07 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-05
  • 通讯作者: 史蕾（1979-）,女,甘肃临夏人,博士,副教授。
  • 作者简介:荣欣雯（2000-）,女,山西太原人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    中华医学会医学教育分会和全国医学教育发展中心2023年度医学教育研究课题（2023A19）; 广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程项目

Application of high-fidelity scenario simulation teaching based on knowledge graph in Emergency and Critical Care Nursing

RONG Xin-wen, SHI Lei, QIN Fang, FANG Ya-xuan, DONG Guang-yuan, LI Nan-yan, ZHU Wen-ting   

  1. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2024-04-07 Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-09-05

PDF (PC)

36

赞

摘要： 目的 探究基于知识图谱的高仿真模拟教学在“急危重症护理学”中的应用效果。方法 选取2020级护理学本科生为研究对象,随机抽取1个班为对照组（35名）,采用常规教学方案;1个班为观察组（39名）,使用“急危重症护理学”知识图谱开展高仿真模拟。课程结束后比较2组自主学习能力,使用教学效果评价问卷及质性访谈了解教学效果及体验。结果 观察组与对照组自主学习能力得分均高于教学前（P<0.001,P<0.05）;组间得分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。观察组77%的护生认为使用知识图谱能够“形成思考问题、解决问题的模式”、69%护生认为“有助于临床思维的培养”。观察组师生对知识图谱及该教学方案表示满意。结论 知识图谱与高仿真模拟结合有助于激发护生学习兴趣,提升综合能力,培养临床思维,为护理教育智能化转型提供参考。

关键词: 知识图谱, 问题图谱, 急危重症护理学, 高仿真模拟教学

Abstract: Objective To explore the teaching effect of high-fidelity scenario simulation teaching based on knowledge graph in Emergency and Critical Care Nursing. Methods Nursing undergraduates in grade 2020 were selected. One class was randomly assigned as control group (35 students) and received conventional teaching. Another class was designated as experimental group (39 students) and participated in high-fidelity scenario simulation teaching using the knowledge graph in "Emergency and Critical Care Nursing". At the end of the course, autonomous learning ability in the two groups were compared. Teaching effectiveness questionnaire and qualitative interview were used to assess teaching effectiveness and students’ experience. Results The score of autonomous learning ability in the two groups were higher than that before the teaching (P<0.001, P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the score between the two groups (P>0.05). In the experimental group, 77% of the students believed that the knowledge graph help "form patterns of thinking and problem-solving," and 69% thought knowledge graph was "beneficial for cultivating clinical thinking". Both teachers and students in the experimental group were satisfied with knowledge graph and the teaching plan. Conclusion The combination of knowledge graph and high-fidelity scenario simulation teaching can stimulate nursing students' interest, enhance their comprehensive competency, cultivate clinical thinking, and serve as reference for the intelligent transformation in nursing education.

Key words: knowledge graph, problem graph, Emergency and Critical Care Nursing, high-fidelity scenario simulation teaching

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 专科护理领域护士培训大纲[R]. (2007-06-12)[2023-09-03]. . 专科护理领域护士培训大纲[R]. (2007-06-12)[2023-09-03]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/gfxwj/201304/ca9f66add17c45d89fd936a98dc75317.shtml.
[2] 曾慧, 杨娜娜, 李昌秀, 等. 3 C引导性反馈下情境模拟教学联合反思提示卡在护理学导论中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3):21-24. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.03.021.
[3] 秦芳, 史蕾, 方雅璇, 等. 情境模拟在急危重症护理学教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019,16(7):524-528. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2019.07.012.
[4] 张姮, 陈丽霞, 杜世正. 护理专业学生线上学习体验的现象阐释学研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(12):1091-1095. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2022.12.007.
[5] 戴岭, 祝智庭. 教育数字化转型的逻辑起点、目标指向和行动路径[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2023(7): 14-20.
[6] 中共中央,国务院. 中国教育现代化2035[R]. (2019-02-23)[2023-08-27].中国教育现代化2035[R]. (2019-02-23)[2023-08-27].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-02/23/content_5367987.htm.
[7] 冯婷婷, 刘德建, 黄璐璐, 等. 数字教育:应用、共享、创新——2024世界数字教育大会综述[J]. 中国电化教育, 2024(3):20-36.
[8] SHAW RS.A study of learning performance of e-learning materials design with knowledge maps[J]. Computers & Education, 2010, 54(1):253-264. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.007.
[9] 杨冰香, 黄润, 徐爱京, 等. 模拟教学引导性反馈的标准和策略[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(1): 18-23. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.01.003.
[10] 李振, 周东岱. 教育知识图谱的概念模型与构建方法研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2019, 40(8):78-86;113. DOI:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.08.010.
[11] 秦芳, 何小凤, 史蕾, 等. 同伴引航式引导性反馈在高仿真情境模拟教学中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2023, 38(24): 68-71;75. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.24.068.
[12] Cheng SF, Kuo CL, Lin KC, et al.Development and preliminary testing of a self-rating instrument to measure self-directed learning ability of nursing students[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2010, 47(9):1152-1158. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.002.
[13] 李萍, 付路易, 棣群. 基于“SCE”项目改进《急危重症护理学》教学效果的研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2020, 37(1): 86-89. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2020.01.023.
[14] 蔡福满, 潘艳, 章飞飞, 等. 基于急危重症护理学在线课程平台的翻转课堂教学实践[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2021, 38(6): 83-86. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.022.
[15] Eel S, KYNGÄS H. The qualitative content analysis process[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2008, 62(1): 107-115. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
[16] 王敏, 陈丹, 欧阳旭平, 等. 基于自主学习系统的动态情景模拟在急危重症护理实训中的应用[J].护理学报, 2019, 26(17):10-13. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.17.010.
[17] 翟雪松, 许家奇, 童兆平, 等. 人工智能赋能高校韧性教学生态的路径研究[J]. 中国远程教育, 2023, 43(1): 49-58. DOI:10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2023.01.007.
[18] 罗莎莎. 论智能时代教师角色变革的根本立场与价值逻辑[J]. 教师教育研究, 2021, 33(4): 32-37. DOI:10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2021.04.006.
[1] 杨帆, 喻爱芳, 何林炎, 唐文帅, 唐友娟, 马香, 李丽娟, 于珺, 潘闯. 急危重症护理学“三融五导”课程思政教学模式设计与实践[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(11): 23-27.
[2] 邓文芳. 急危重症护理学“理实双驱三堂联动”教学创新体系的构建与实践[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(10): 21-24.
[3] 高子寒, 杨丽, 魏晓, 贾凤菊, 王敏. 基于Web of Sciense的延续性护理研究热点前沿可视化分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 12-18.
[4] 李源, 李旻露, 孟庆童, 方进博. 基于Web of Science过渡期护理的研究文献可视化分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(18): 37-41.
[5] 王婷婷, 章新琼, 张小敏. 基于知识图谱技术的我国肺癌患者运动训练研究热点分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(17): 15-19.
[6] 王敏, 陈丹, 欧阳旭平, 鲍祎敏, 叶湘漓. 基于自主学习系统的动态情景模拟在急危重症护理实训中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(17): 10-13.
[7] 刘桂英, 刘幼华, 郭红, 易晓平, 张艳艳. 国际失智护理研究热点可视化分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 22-26.
[8] 褚慧慧,陈沁,黄丽敏,钟彤. 护理高仿真模拟教学行为评价量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(8): 1-4.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!