以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 49-52.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.07.049

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

229例产科监护室高危妊娠产妇泌乳启动延迟现状及影响因素分析

谢晓星1,2, 赵敏慧1   

  1. 1.同济大学附属第一妇婴保健院 护理部,上海 200000;
    2.宁波市妇女儿童医院 产科监护室,浙江 宁波 315010
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-05 出版日期:2021-04-10 发布日期:2021-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵敏慧(1973-),女,上海人,硕士,副主任护师。E-mail:18939915592@163.com
  • 作者简介:谢晓星(1989-),女,浙江温州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,主管护师。

Current Status of Delayed Onset of Lactogenesis II of High-risk Pregnant Women in Maternal Intensive Care Unit and Its Influence Factors: A 229-case Study

XIE Xiao-xing1,2, ZHAO Min-hui1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200000, China;
    2. Maternal Intensive Care Unit, Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital, Ningbo 315010, China
  • Received:2020-06-05 Online:2021-04-10 Published:2021-05-12

摘要: 目的 调查产科监护室高危妊娠产妇泌乳Ⅱ期启动延迟现状,并分析其影响因素。方法 采用便利抽样方法,选取2019年5—10月浙江省某三级甲等母婴专科医院分娩后入住产科监护室的229例高危妊娠产妇作为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表、泌乳日志、爱丁堡产后抑郁量表及中文版疲乏评定量表对其进行调查。采用二分类Logistic回归分析产科监护室高危妊娠产妇泌乳启动延迟的影响因素。结果 229例产科监护室高危妊娠产妇发生泌乳启动延迟97例,发生率为42.4%;二分类Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄≥35岁(OR=2.523,P=0.003)、有妊娠期高血压病(OR=2.523,P=0.003)、开奶时间晚(OR=0.924,P=0.025)是产科监护室高危妊娠产妇泌乳启动延迟的危险因素。结论 产科监护室高危妊娠产妇泌乳启动延迟率较高,尤其应关注年龄≥35岁、有妊娠期高血压疾病、开奶时间晚的高危妊娠产妇,建议做好孕期保健及健康教育,加强泌乳干预,促进营养吸收,增加产妇泌乳知识,以降低泌乳启动延迟率。

关键词: 产科监护室, 高危妊娠, 产妇, 泌乳启动延迟

Abstract: Objective To investigate the status quo of delayed onset of lactogenesis Ⅱ(DOL Ⅱ) and its influence factors of high-risk pregnant women in maternal intensive care unit (MICU). Methods Totally 229 parturients admitted to MICU immediately after termination of pregnancy in a tertiary grade-A maternal and child healthcare hospital in Zhejiang Province from May to October 2019 were selected by convenient sampling method. General information questionnaire, lactation log, the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Chinese version of the Fatigue Rating Scale (FS-14) were used to investigate the influence factors of DOL Ⅱ and binary logistic regression analysis was performed for data analysis. Results Of the total, 97 cases suffered DOL Ⅱ, with an incidence of 42.4%. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that aged ≥35 (OR=2.523, P=0.003), with hypertensive disease during pregnancy (OR=2.523, P=0.003), and late secretion of colostrums (OR=0.924, P=0.025) were risk factors for DOL Ⅱ. Conclusion High-risk pregnant women in MICU have a higher rate of DOL Ⅱ. Special attention should be paid to high-risk pregnant women aged ≥35 years, those with hypertensive disease during pregnancy, and those with late secretion of colostrums. Pregnancy healthcare and health education, lactation intervention, nutrient absorption, and maternal lactation knowledge are beneficial to reducing the rate of DOL Ⅱ.

Key words: maternal intensive care unit, high-risk parturient, parturient, delayed onset of lactogenesis Ⅱ

中图分类号: 

  • R473.71
[1] Neville MC, Morton J.Physiology and Endocrine Changes underlying Human Lactogenesis II[J]. Nutr, 2001,131(11): 3005-3008. DOI:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801799.
[2] Nommsen-Rivers LA, Chantry CJ, Peerson JM, et al.Delayed Onset of Lactogenesis among First-time Mothers Is Related to Maternal Obesity and Factors Associated with Ineffective Breastfeeding[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2010,92(3): 574-584. DOI:10.3945/ajcn.2010.29192.
[3] Haile ZT, Chavan BB, Teweldeberhan A, et al.Association Between Gestational Weight Gain and Delayed Onset of Lactation: The Moderating Effects of Race/Ethnicity[J]. Breastfeeding Med, 2017, 12(2):79-85. DOI:10.1089/bfm.2016.0134.
[4] 丁佩佩,赵梅,张凤英,等.产妇妊娠晚期营养素摄入情况及Ⅱ期泌乳启动延迟影响因素分析[J].中国全科医学,2020,23(5):534-539.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.105.
[5] 吴祝凤,徐琼,杨楠楠,等.产后泌乳启动延迟的现状及其干预措施分析[J].护理学报,2018,25(1):30-34.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.01.034.
[6] Vanderlaan J, Dunlop A, Rochat R, et al.Methodology for Sampling Women at High Maternal Risk in Administrative Data[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2019,19(1):364. DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2500-7.
[7] 朱旭红,姜李媛.2015—2017年妊娠高危因素变化情况及分级分层管理应用分析[J].中国全科医学, 2019,22(26):3217-3221. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.071.
[8] 任钰雯,高海凤.母乳喂养理论与实践[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:12.
[9] Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R.Detection of Postnatal Depression. Development of The 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale[J].Br J Psychiatry, 1987(150):782-786. DOI:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.
[10] Lee DT, Yip SK, Chiu HF, et al.Detecting Postnatal Depression in Chinese Women.Validation of the Chinese Version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale[J]. Br J Psychiatry, 1998, 172:433-437.DOI:10.1192/bjp.172.5.433.
[11] Liu ZH, He ST, Deng CM, et al.Neuraxial Labour Analgesia Is Associated with a Reduced Risk of Maternal Depres-sion at 2 Years after Childbirth: A Multicentre, Prospective, Longitudinal Study[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2019, 36(10):745-754. DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001058.
[12] Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, et al.Development of a Fatigue Scale[J]. J Psychosom Res, 1993, 37(2):147-153. DOI:10.1016/0022-3999(93)90081-p.
[13] 王天芳,张翠珍,刘雁峰.慢性疲劳综合征病人的疲劳、抑郁、焦虑与生活事件的特点及其相关性分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2000, 9(2):84.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2000.02.002.
[14] 栾丹丹,于秀荣,蔺香云.早产儿母亲泌乳Ⅱ期启动时间与产后早期泌乳量的相关性研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2018,(8):874-879.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018.08.002.
[15] Yu X, Li J, Lin X,et al.Association between Delayed Lactogenesis Ⅱ and Early Milk Volume among Mothers of Preterm Infants[J]. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci),2019,13(2):93-98.DOI:10.1016/j.anr.2019.02.001.
[16] 袁水琴,李秋芳,徐鑫芬.早产儿母亲泌乳启动延迟影响因素的研究进展[J].中国护理管理,2019,19(8):1244-1247.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.08.027.
[17] Rocha BO, Machado MP, Bastos LL, et al.Risk Factors for Delayed Onset of Lactogenesis II among Primiparous Mothers from a Brazilian Baby-friendly Hospital[J]. [J] Hum Lact.2020,36(1):146-156.DOI:10.1177/0890334419835174.
[18] 袁梦梅,曾铁英,代玲,等.女性分娩恐惧真实体验质性研究的系统评价[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(15):69-73.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.15.069.
[19] Vigil-De Gracia P, Ramirez R, Durán Y, et al. Magnesium Sulfate for 6 vs 24 Hours post Delivery in Patients who Received Magnesium Sulfate for Less Than 8 Hours Before Birth: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2017,17(1):241.DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1424-3.
[20] Liu Y, Yao J, Liu X, et al.A Randomized Interventional Study to Promote Milk Secretion during Mother-baby Separation based on the Health Belief Model: A Consort Compliant[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(42):e12921. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000012921.
[21] Motiang M.Obstetric Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital,Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa[J].SAJCC, 2017,33(1):12-14. DOI:10.7196/SAJCC.2017.v33i1.279.
[22] Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M.Maternal Critical Care:What Can We Learn from Patient Experience?A qualitative Study[J]. BMJ Open,2015,5(4):e006676. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006676.
[23] 龚妹,郑九生.规范围生期保健对子痫前期妊娠结局的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(4):630-633. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.04.015.
[1] 夏杰, 段霞, 张佳男, 于婵, 王可可. 高危孕产妇病情预警评估表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 67-72.
[2] 刘双, 张平. 待产裙裤的研制及应用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(22): 77-78.
[3] 马素文, 孙峥, 吴杰, 尚洁, 张苗, 卢洁. 老人儿童及孕产妇磁共振检查护理配合流程的改进[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 24-26.
[4] 刘幸, 万丽. 对分娩中产妇应用会阴评估量表指导会阴切开的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 60-64.
[5] 邹丽, 李静, 房媛媛, 魏素花. 医用孕产妇踝泵运动辅助计量器的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(7): 77-78.
[6] 李亚敏, 宋丽莉, 韩翠存, 田策, 祝琴, 赵红. 初产妇与经产妇分娩体验问卷得分水平比较[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(6): 70-74.
[7] 张竑, 沈敏, 郑雅宁. 外敷产妇服的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(5): 75-76.
[8] 李丹莹. 258例剖宫产妇出院准备度水平分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(2): 51-54.
[9] 胡恩华, 庞志强, 尹炜, 聂涛, 黄海燕. 1例重症肺炎产妇行体外膜肺氧合联合俯卧位通气治疗的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(11): 68-70.
[10] 赵彩霞,陆金美,朱春云,崔娟. 无缝隙护理干预对乳头凹陷初产妇母乳喂养的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(9): 53-56.
[11] 郑雅宁,丁颖,吴瑜玲. 基于自我效能的集中群组保健模式对产妇母乳喂养的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(5): 75-78.
[12] 贾丹丹,马丽丽,杨绪影,陈婉莹,任珂,王楠,郑常洁,王晓,和鑫鑫. 192名产妇出院准备度与出院指导质量的相关性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(3): 42-45.
[13] 邹丽, 郑雅宁, 吴瑜玲. 剖宫产术后医用皮肤接触组合母子衣的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 77-78.
[14] 吴尔,廖瑛华,陈少玉,周琼,鲁丽容. 母亲角色适应在初产妇社会支持和养育效能间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(13): 55-59.
[15] 吴祝凤,徐琼,杨楠楠,石莫. 产后泌乳启动延迟的现状及其干预措施分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 30-34.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 杜金磊, 陈志美, 秦兰芳, 廉洁, 孙文静, 王翔, 徐巍, 邹晓月. 基于昼夜节律机制对ICU老年患者肠内营养延续性护理的对照研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 1 -5 .
[2] 谭天, 庞永慧, 左红群, 邓玉燕. 隔姜灸对结直肠癌行腹腔镜根治术后凝血功能的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 6 -10 .
[3] 田丽, 李梦媛, 肖抒情, 阎玲. 晚期癌症患者预期性悲伤的现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 11 -14 .
[4] 管艳, 卢山, 叶家欣, 王哲芸. 心脏术后压力性损伤规范化实践方案的构建与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 15 -20 .
[5] 任黎, 赵秀芳. 基于洋葱模型的妇幼专科医院新护士岗位胜任力模型及指标体系构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 21 -25 .
[6] 肖萍, 宋洁, 吴淑琳, 姜倩倩, 陈海雯, 刘霖. 护生接受痴呆教育干预的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 26 -29 .
[7] 刘雨安, 杨小文, 李乐之. 机器学习在疾病预测的应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 30 -34 .
[8] 刘萍, 尤奥林, 刘姝, 李亚楠, 栾晓嵘. 我国护理硕士专业学位研究生就读期间培养体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 35 -42 .
[9] 李换则, 陈鸿芳, 黄丽群, 安芳芳, 徐鹏, 庄苗青, 张露语, 王嘉懿. 急诊科护士临终照护体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 43 -48 .
[10] 刘鑫, 江锦芳, 覃彦珠, 周帅, 施洁, 刘彦君. 215例结直肠癌造口患者家庭主要照顾者照顾能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 53 -58 .