情绪劳动策略在调节模式和护士工作满意度间的中介效应

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.01.068

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨情绪劳动策略在调节模式和护士工作满意度间的中介作用。方法便利抽样抽取西安市3所三级甲等医院的384名护士,采用一般资料问卷、调节模式量表、情绪劳动量表及工作满意度量表对其进行调查,建立和检验情绪劳动策略在调节模式和护士工作满意度之间的中介模型。结果护士工作满意度的总均分为（3.37±0.81）分,其中外源性工作满意度均分为（3.47±0.79）分,内源性工作满意度均分为（3.27±0.94）分。工作满意度与运动模式呈一般正相关（r=0.305,P<0.01）,与深层扮演呈一般正相关（r=0.275,P<0.01）。深层扮演在运动模式与工作满意度之间存在中介效应,深层扮演对护士工作满意度的直接效应和间接效应分别为0.223、0.081。结论调节模式对护士工作满意度有直接预测作用,情绪调节策略在调节模式与护士工作满意度之间存在中介效应。应重视护士工作满意度状况,通过培养护士运动模式并激发其增加深层扮演策略的使用、减少表层扮演策略的运用来提高其工作满意度。

关键词: 护士, 工作满意度, 调节模式, 情绪劳动策略

Abstract: Objective To explore the mediating effect of emotional labor strategy on regulatory mode and nurses' job satisfaction. Methods The convenience sampling method was used in this study. The Regulatory Mode Scale (RMS), Emotional Labor Scale (ELS) and Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) and a self-designed general information questionnaire were used to investigate 384 nurses from 3 tertiary grade A hospitals of Xi'an,then we established and tested the mediating model of emotional labor strategy between regulatory mode and nurses' job satisfaction. Results The total average score of nurses' job satisfaction was 3.37±0.81; that of dimension of exogenous job satisfaction was 3.47±0.79 and that of dimension of endogenous job satisfaction was 3.27±0.94. Nurses' job satisfaction was positively correlated with locomotion mode (r=0.305, P<0.01) and deep acting (r=0.275, P<0.01). Deep acting had a mediating effect on locomotion and nurses' job satisfaction, and the direct and indirect effects of deep acting on nurses' job satisfaction were 0.223 and 0.081 respectively. Conclusion Regulatory mode can directly predict nurses' job satisfaction, and there is a mediating effect of emotional labor strategy on the regulatory mode and the nurses' job satisfaction. We should pay more attention to nurses' job satisfaction, and improve their job satisfaction by training nurses' locomotion mode and stimulating them to use deep acting strategy and reducing the application of surface acting strategy.

Key words: nurse, job satisfaction, regulatory mode, emotional labor strategy

中图分类号:

R471

刘娜, 吴迪, 柳琴, 程菡, 杜晓丽, 张银玲. 情绪劳动策略在调节模式和护士工作满意度间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(1): 68-71.

LIU Na, WU Di, LIU Qin, CHENG Han, DU Xiao-li, ZHANG Yin-ling. Mediating Effect of Emotional Labor Strategy on Regulatory Mode and Nurses' Job Satisfaction[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2019, 26(1): 68-71.

参考文献

[1] 周英婷,詹丽红.临床护士工作满意度的相关影响因素分析[J].基层医学论坛,2017,21(12):1545-1546. DOI:10.19435/j.1672-1721.2017.12.077.
[2] 董剑霞,文进,袁萍,等. 护士工作满意度、职业倦怠与护理差错关系研究[J]. 长治医学院学报,2018,32(2):140-144.
[3] 段艮芳,何海艳,何燕,等.某市三级医院临床护士工作满意度对离职意愿的影响[J].中国卫生事业管理, 2014,31(10):746-749.
[4] 佘启发,叶龙.工作嵌入、工作满意度对工作绩效的影响研究[J].江西社会科学,2018,38(1):227-235.
[5] 丁晓彤,李惠萍,杨娅娟,等.护士长工作家庭冲突、工作控制感与工作满意度调查及其关系研究[J]. 现代预防医学,2017,44(13):2396-2400.
[6] 任芬,王斌全,武婷.护士工作场所暴力与工作满意度的相关性研究[J].护理研究,2016,30(7B):2547-2548. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2016.20.042.
[7] 杜培花,赵文凤.护士工作环境与工作满意度关系的调查分析[J].检验医学与临床,2016, 13(11):1547-1550.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2016.11.038.
[8] 郭小青,汪玲.大四学生情绪调节策略和调节模式与焦虑的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2016,30(9):706-711.DOI:10.3969 /j.issn.1000-6729.2016.09.013.
[9] Higgins E T, Kruglanski A W, Pierro A.Regulatory Mode: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Orientations[J]. Adv Exp Soc Psychol, 2003, 35(3):293-344.DOI:10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01005-0.
[10] Kruglanski A W, Higgins E T, Atash M N, et al.To “Do the Right Thing” or to “Just Do It”: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Self-regulatory Imperatives[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2000, 79(5):793-815. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.793.
[11] Pierro A, Kruglanski A W, Higgins E T.Regulatory Mode and the Joys Of Doing: Effects of ‘Locomotion' and ‘Assessment' on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Task-motivation[J]. Eur J Pers, 2010, 20(5):355-375.DOI:10.1002/per.600.
[12] Beek I V, Hu Q, Schaufeli W B, et al.For Fun, Love, or Money: What Drives Workaholic, Engaged, and Burned-out Employees at Work?[J]. J Appl Psychol, 2011, 61(1):30-55.DOI:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x.
[13] 王心怡,王乾宇,张月娟,等.情绪智力、情绪劳动策略与主观幸福感的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志, 2018,26(2):380-382.DOI:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.02.036.
[14] 王海雯,张淑华.情绪劳动策略与工作满意度关系的元分析[J].心理科学进展,2018,26(4):599-613. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00599.
[15] 逄晓鸣,汪玲,肖凤秋,等.反事实思维与后悔的关系:调节模式的调节作用[J].心理科学,2012,35(5):1137-1143.
[16] Grandey A A.When “the show must go on”: Surface Acting and Deep Acting as Determinants of Emotional Exhaustion and Peer-rated Service Delivery[J]. Acad Manage J, 2003, 46(1):86-96.DOI:10.2307/30040678.
[17] 李彦慧. 医护人员情绪劳动、工作伦理对医患关系的影响[D]. 曲阜:曲阜师范大学,2016.
[18] 潘慧. 护士长领导行为与护士工作满意度、组织承诺的相关性研究[D]. 延吉:延边大学,2008.
[19] 侯静,郭红艳,孙红,等.护士长领导风格、护士工作满意度对工作绩效的影响[J].中华护理杂志, 2013,48(3):251-253.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2013.03.021.
[20] 任雅欣,周英,黄美凌,等.1259名护士工作满意度及其影响因素研究[J].护理管理杂志,2015,15(2):86-88.
[21] 魏怡. 调节模式对拖延行为的影响:时间管理倾向的中介效应[D].武汉:武汉大学, 2017.
[22] 齐菲,杨帅,李建会,等.护士情绪劳动对职业倦怠及健康状况的影响[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2016,31(8):873-874.
[23] 罗灿. 组织认同、员工情绪劳动与工作满意度的关系研究[D]. 长沙:湖南师范大学,2015.
[24] 逄晓鸣,王爱娟,吴红霞,等. 不同调节模式类型对校正任务影响的实验研究[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2009(s4):52-55.
[25] Garcia D, Jimmefors A, Mousavi F, et al.Self-regulatory Mode (Locomotion and Assessment), Well-being (Subjective and Psychological), and Exercise Behavior (Frequency and Intensity) in Relation to High School Pupils' Academic Achievement[J]. Peer J, 2015, 3(847):e847. DOI:10.7717/peerj.847.
[26] 莫申江,施俊琦.情绪劳动策略对主动破坏行为的影响[J].心理学报,2017,49(3):349-358.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00349.
[27] Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis A, Orehek E, Scheier M F.The Meaning of Action: Do Self-regulatory Processes Contribute to a Purposeful Life?[J]. Pers Individ Dif, 2017(116):115-122. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.040.
[28] Chernikova M, Destro C L, Mauro R, et al.Different Strokes for Different Folks: Effects of Regulatory Mode Complementarity and Task Complexity on Performance[J]. Pers Individ Dif, 2016(89):134-142.DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.011.
[29] 苏立宁,张徐敏.情绪劳动研究的回顾和展望[J].淮南师范学院学报,2018,20(1):124-129.
[30] Chen Z, Sun H, Lam W, et al.Chinese Hotel Employees in the Smiling Masks: Roles of Job Satisfaction, Burnout, and Supervisory Support in Relationships Between Emotional Labor and Performance[J]. Int J Hum Resour Man, 2012, 23(4):826-845.DOI:10.1080/09585192.2011.579918.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared