管理学报
  125年6月10日 星期二
首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编 委 会 |  投稿须知 |  期刊订阅 |  广告服务 |  联系我们 |  留言板 | English
J4  2015, Vol. 12 Issue (1): 134-    DOI:
物流与运作管理 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
产品改进与增值性服务冲突下制造商的选择策略研究
张旭梅,韩小鹏,徐广业,刘翔宇
1.重庆大学经济与工商管理学院;2.重庆大学工商管理与 经济发展研究中心;3.西南政法大学管理学院
Manufacturer’s Selection under the Conflict between Product Improvement and ValueAdded Service
ZHANG Xumei,HAN Xiaopeng,XU Guangye,LIU Xiangyu
1. Chongqing University, Chongqing, China; 2. Southwest University of Political & Law, Chongqing, China

全文: PDF (983 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对产品改进与增值性服务可能存在冲突的情况,根据消费者效用理论构建了产品和增值性服务的需求函数,研究了制造商进行产品改进还是提供增值性服务的选择策略问题。研究表明,当增值性服务效用较高时,制造商同时进行产品改进和提供增值性服务。当增值性服务效用较低时,制造商有4种选择方式:在产品改进成本系数较低的情况下,制造商选择只进行产品改进;在产品改进成本系数较高并且冲突系数较低的情况下,进行产品改进并同时提供增值性服务;在两者都较高时,只向市场提供改进型产品;但在产品改进成本系数足够大的情况下,制造商会放弃产品改进,只提供增值性服务。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 产品改进增值性服务挤出效应制造服务选择策略    
Abstract:Considering the potential conflict between product improvement and valueadded service, a demand function regarding the product improvement and the valueadded service is built based on consumer utility theory. The selection between the product improvement and the valueadded service or of both for the manufacturer is studied. The result indicates that the manufacturer chooses to improve products and provide valueadded service at the same time when the valueadded service utility is relatively high. The result also shows that there are four cases when the valueadded service utility is low: when the product improvement cost coefficient is relatively low, the manufacturer chooses only to improve products; when the product improvement cost coefficient is relatively high and the conflict coefficient is relatively low, the manufacturer chooses to improve products and provide valueadded service simultaneously; when both the product improvement cost coefficient and the conflict coefficient are relatively high, the manufacturer only makes product improvement; however, the manufacturer only provides valueadded service but gives up improving products when the product improvement cost coefficient is sufficiently high.
Key wordsproduct improvement    valueadded service    crowdingout effect    manufacturing service    selective strategy   
收稿日期: 2013-09-08     
基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272086); 国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAF12B09); 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20120191110042) ; 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(NCET100884)
通讯作者: 张旭梅 (1966~),女,四川仁寿人。重庆大学(重庆市400044)经济与工商管理学院教授、博士研究生导师。研究方向为制造业服务化、供应链管理等。     E-mail: zhangxumei@cqu.edu.cn
引用本文:   
张旭梅,韩小鹏,徐广业,刘翔宇. 产品改进与增值性服务冲突下制造商的选择策略研究 [J]. J4, 2015, 12(1): 134-. ZHANG Xumei,HAN Xiaopeng,XU Guangye,LIU Xiangyu. Manufacturer’s Selection under the Conflict between Product Improvement and ValueAdded Service. J4, 2015, 12(1): 134-.
链接本文:  
http://manu68.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_glxb/CN/     或     http://manu68.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_glxb/CN/Y2015/V12/I1/134
版权所有 © 《管理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn